PROVO --
Nu Skin Enterprises has been named as the defendant in a class-action lawsuit
filed by stockholder Paul Siesser claiming that the Provo-based company failed
to disclose sales practices and false claims related to the company's growth in
China.
The suit,
filed in the U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City, claims that the company
failed to follow U.S. federal securities laws that ban pyramid schemes, which
sent public stock prices tumbling.
"This
action arises from Nu Skin's failure to disclose its fraudulent sales practices
and non-compliance with Chinese laws and regulations," according to the
suit.
In
January, an article in a Chinese newspaper calling Nu Skin a "suspected
illegal pyramid scheme" took a toll on the Provo-based company's stock.
News outlet
Bloomberg first reported the falling stock of Nu Skin as it reported that its
shares had plummeted nearly 16 percent in light of the article, which also
accused Nu Skin of using "brainwashing" techniques on its marketers
in China.
Nu Skin
issued a statement denying the claims by the People's Daily and said it is
working in full compliance with Chinese regulations.
"The
article that appeared in today's People's Daily contains inaccuracies and
exaggerations that are not representative of Nu Skin's business in China,"
according to a statement by the company. "The reporters did not attempt to
verify any information with Nu Skin. We do not believe that the article was the
result of any particular government inquiry."
According
to Bloomberg, Nu Skin suffered its largest in-day stock value tumble since
October 2004.
The suit
filed this week claims that even after its stock began falling, Nu Skin
continued to tell investors that "China is a 'growing market for the
direct selling industry,' 'hold[ing] great promise' and 'represent[ing] a
significant opportunity to expand [Nu Skins] business."
"We
believe the allegations are without merit and intend to defend ourselves
vigorously," Nu Skin stated in a press release issued in response to the
suit.
The suit says
that Siesser seeks a jury trial, and damages for class members including
interest and attorneys fees as well as "further relief as the Court may
deem just and proper."







No comments:
Post a Comment